9/11 Facts Collection
Events of September 11, 2001 – Evidence-Based Facts
A Summary of the Most Credible Facts
Focusing on Academic and Scientific Research
Many Published in Peer-Reviewed Journals
The 9/11 event and its associated ‘war on terror’ are still used
to justify western foreign policy and domestic law changes to this day
LATEST: In a letter dated Nov. 7, 2018, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York responded favorably to the petition of the Lawyers Committee for 9/11 Inquiry (see following paragraph) to convene a grand jury to review evidence submitted to them by the Committee. Richard Gage, founder of Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth and Barbara Honegger tell all about it on this video: Link to youtube video.
On April 10, 2018 the Lawyers Committee for 9/11 Inquiry submitted a legal petition to the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York for a Grand Jury to examine the evidence for the destruction of the World Trade Center buildings on 9/11.
The 52-page petition, accompanied by 57 exhibits of evidence, states “The Lawyers’ Committee has reviewed the relevant available evidence . . . and has reached a consensus that there is not just substantial or persuasive evidence of yet-to-be-prosecuted crimes related to the use of pre-planted explosives and/or incendiaries to destroy WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 in New York City on 9/11, but there is actually conclusive evidence that such federal crimes were committed... The Lawyers' Committee states unequivocally that the evidence permits no other conclusion - as a matter of science, as a matter of logic, and as a matter of law."
'Grand Jury Investigation of Collapse of WTC Twin Towers and Building Seven', Global Research, April 2018
Grand Jury Petition - Executive Summary and Full Document, Lawyers Committee for 9/11 Inquiry
On September 11, 2001 a third World Trade Center high-rise building, WTC 7 (47 stories) also completely collapsed some hours after WTC 1 and 2. The building was not hit by a plane and had fires on some floors.
The collapse was sudden, symmetrical and at free-fall acceleration (confirmed officially by NIST). This means the building collapsed through the path of greatest resistance (itself) without any resistance (free-fall).
According to the laws of physics, this is consistent with controlled demolition. The planning and setup of controlled demolition takes weeks to months and requires unrestricted access through building security.
World Trade Center Building 7 (WTC 7) Collapse Footage (1:06) *
The third high-rise to collapse on 9/11 and was not hit by a plane
Other facts on that day include:
- The discovery of nano-thermite explosive in the WTC building dust
- Extreme temperatures as high as 2,760’C (5000’F) compared to a maximum possible temperature of 1,000’C (1,800’F) for jet-fuel ignited office fires
- Various forms of molten metal
- Many first-responder testimonies of explosions
- Seismic analysis indicating explosive events before plane impacts and before building collapses and
- Horizontal ejection of human bone fragments.
These facts are in-conflict with the official explanation and are all consistent with the controlled demolition hypothesis.
The 9/11 Commission Report made no mention of WTC 7. The NIST investigation stated a "new phenomenon" had occurred where a high-rise building collapsed due to fire - a first in the history of tall building fires where no building has ever fully collapsed due to fire, with many examples of much larger and longer-lasting fires.
Many issues with the official investigations have been reported including the 9/11 Commissioners themselves stating they didn’t get to the truth (see Official Investigations).
Further facts include:
- Significant anomalies of the air defense
- A stand-down order of the air defense
- Multiple war games occurring simultaneously and directly related to the event
- Suspicious accounts of the activities of several officials in charge
- Evidence of government agency complicity and
- Insider trading confirmed during the days prior.
These facts come from credible sources including many scientific and academic papers published in peer-reviewed journals (see Evidence-Based Facts).
There is also a relevant historical context that includes:
- "Operation Northwoods" - an earlier US plan to deceptively orchestrate violent terrorism on US cities and blame it on an enemy as justification for war - a "false flag" operation
- A US plan to invade 7 countries in 5 years
- The Project for a New American Century calling for a "new Pearl Harbor event" to expand US global superiority
- The manufacture of an external threat for political gain
- The fabricated justification for the Iraq War
- A pattern of fabrications for US engagement in war
- US government-created domestic terrorism
- US support of international terrorism
- A history of false flag terrorism by governments
- A history of US "State Crimes Against Democracy", and
- Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld convicted as war criminals.
See Historical Context.
There are credible explanations as to why we in the West resist this information, including a ‘cultural taboo’ regarding possible ‘conspiracy theories’ (see Psychology ).
Many credible people who have spoken out include:
- Ferdinando Imposimato - Honorary President of the Supreme Court of Italy
- Dr. Tun Mahathir Mohamad - former Prime Minister of Malaysia
- Dr. Paul Craig Roberts - former Assistant Secretary of the US Treasury and former Associate Editor of the Wall Street Journal
- Bill Christison - former senior CIA National Intelligence Officer and Director of the CIA's Office of Regional and Political Analysis
A selection of evidence-based resources for further information is provided (see Resource List).