Has the official conspiracy theory (Al Qaeda conspiring to attack America) been properly investigated?
The 9/11 Commission Report
1. Statements by the 9/11 Commissioners
2. Most of the claimed evidence came from torture interrogations, which is not legally admissible, and included fabricated testimony.
3. Omission of critical evidence
4. Destruction of evidence
5. Fabrication of evidence
6. Several of the alleged hijackers are still alive, with no ties to terrorism.
7. The alleged high-speed, 330-degree downward spiral of American Flight 77 into the Pentagon by the amateur hijacker pilot is said to be “totally impossible” and “too ridiculous to consider” by airline pilots.
8. None of the eight pilots on the four flights transmitted the universal hijack code as they are trained to do.
9. The passenger cell phone calls from the hijacked flights were not technologically possible at high altitude.
10. The official claim that the hijackers were devout Muslims is contradicted by multiple news reports of their behavior.
11. The official claim that Flight 93 crashed in a field in Pennsylvania is contradicted by news reports of no plane parts visible at the crash site and plane parts found up to several miles away.
12. Dozens of facts omitted or distorted
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) 9/11 Building Collapse Reports
1. NIST did not analyze the total collapse of WTC 1 and 2, it only assessed up to “collapse initiation.”
2. NIST denied the most important evidence regarding WTC 7’s destruction: sudden and symmetrical collapse at free fall acceleration.
3. NIST provided erroneous explanations for the molten metal pouring out of WTC 2 and in the debris of all three buildings, no explanation of the extremely high temperatures and no comment on the nano-thermite explosive in the WTC dust.
4. NIST’s WTC 7 computer model does not match the observed collapse, stops unexpectedly, and required multiple fictitious parameters to achieve collapse.
5. Implausibility of official explanation of WTC 1 & 2 collapse
6. Implausibility of official explanation of WTC 7 collapse
7. Study of WTC 7 collapse by University of Alaska Fairbanks states a ‘zero’ probability that NIST is correct based on preliminary findings.
8. Honorary President of the Supreme Court of Italy says, “It is impossible to accept the conclusions of these bodies [911 Commission and NIST reports], which are against the truth….”
Multiple facts indicate that the official investigations cannot be considered credible.
What are the credible facts then?